adeck/python-urx-getl-rt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

use movep as default, small cleanups many places

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Olivier R-D
2013-06-19 09:20:33 +02:00
parent 3f728e3e02
commit d497364919
4 changed files with 70 additions and 63 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
urx/ursecmon.py
View File

@@ -233,8 +233,7 @@ class SecondaryMonitor(Thread):
check program execution status in the secondary client data packet we get from the robot
This interface uses only data from the secondary client interface (see UR doc)
Only the last connected client is the primary client,
so this is not guaranted and we cannot rely on information only
send to the primary client(like program execution start ?!?!?)
so this is not guaranted and we cannot rely on information to the primary client.
"""
while not self._trystop:
@@ -278,13 +277,13 @@ class SecondaryMonitor(Thread):
returns something that looks like a packet, nothing is guaranted
"""
while True:
#self.logger.debug("data queue size is: {}".format(len(self._dataqueue)))
self.logger.debug("data queue size is: {}".format(len(self._dataqueue)))
ans = self._parser.find_first_packet(self._dataqueue[:])
if ans:
self._dataqueue = ans[1]
return ans[0]
else:
#self.logger.debug("Could not find packet in received data")
self.logger.debug("Could not find packet in received data")
tmp = self._s_secondary.recv(1024)
self._dataqueue += tmp
@@ -339,6 +338,8 @@ class SecondaryMonitor(Thread):
def cleanup(self):
self._trystop = True
self.join()
#with self._dataEvent: #wake up any thread that may be waiting for data before we close. Should we do that?
#self._dataEvent.notifyAll()
if self._s_secondary:
with self._prog_queue_lock:
self._s_secondary.close()